Professional athletes are red since the start of the week as MPs discuss several amendments concerning "the name of tax fairness." What professional athletes are they privileged taxpayers? Amendments, including those worn by Yves Bur UMP deputies and Marc Le Fur, aim to change both devices. First, the option income tax benefit of (or "sprawl"). Clearly, professional athletes can smooth their income, that is to say, to average their income over three to five years. Finally, they can in this way, deduct one third of taxable income. Tuesday in the state budget, MPs have decided to book only to fans that tax advantage.

Second advantage, that permitting the exemption of social contributions and employers under the "collective image rights" (DIC).1237 athletes have benefited from this advantage in 2007. It is already anticipated that the scheme ends in June 30, 2012, but a new amendment proposes that ?ch?nace intervene earlier, specifically on 1 January 2010. "More than athletes, they are also clubs that take advantage of this benefit as part of the remuneration of the sport is exempt from payroll taxes and employer. This allows clubs to keep some French players, potentially leaving for abroad without it, "shade Christophe Breton, specializing in asset management for top athletes. So the club is saving costs and not the athlete directly. The shortfall for the state would be 30 million per year.Adopted almost unanimously with a vote in the Committee on Social Affairs, the UMP amendment must still be voted on in public session next week.

A Mercato costly for state

A third device was questioned in the draft law of 22 July, the favorable tax treatment to impatriation enjoyed by all occupational categories and not just professional athletes. The scheme originally thought to prevent brain drain to foreign countries (emigration of French researchers in the United States and leaders in England for example) is also used by professional athletes as part of their transfers when they leave foreign clubs.This attractive scheme allows beneficiaries to receive an allowance for a limited period of 5 years provided only they were not fiscally domiciled in France during the five years before taking office. "The advantage is in particular the exemption of additional compensation related to the return to France," said Mr. Lefevre P?aron (Morgan Lewis). Some MPs intend to exclude professional sports scheme. Figures to support the member of the Cotes d'Armor explains that the four transfers most important championship of France Ligue 1 football had "cost" to the State under impatriation nearly 1.5 million euros in the Mercato 2008-2009.

"Undermine the entire economy of clubs"

For many asset managers, reform the tax and social benefits, especially the DIC, will undermine the attractiveness of the French market. For Schatzl Frederick, president of Elite Heritage, this amendment is a mistake of a economic standpoint. The wealthy athletes will go to other countries more attractive: they will come in France, so they do not consume more and pay more taxes. "Even the sound of bells from the middle of sport ensures that the state will lose. According to the Professional Football League (LFP), professional football will yield 600 million euros in social charges and fiscal 2009. "These samples sitting on the payroll of players will decrease if teams are forced to revise downwards earnings to offset the effect of the measures announced.These ultimately will cost more money than they relate and will not be profitable for the state, "says the president of the LFP, Frederic Thiriez.Tout as the French Football Federation (FFF) National Union of Professional Footballers Thursday expressed its concern. Sylvain Kastendeutch, co-president of the UNFP, denounces an attempt to bring down the overall economy of football. "The reform is presented as a way to reap benefits in a few stars. Not true, it is a bad blow to football because it will weaken the entire economy of the clubs, "he warns. By Tuesday, the day of voting in the plenary of the amendment on the abolition of the exemption under the "right to collective image, the sport community intends to defend his vote.

ALSO READ

A member calls the end of tax benefits for athletes



Comments are closed.